Obedience
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.7. . . and day'. The reference to obedience is probably due to . . .
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.7. . . to the context of Eph.5.28f. Obedience was never a marriage . . .

Obedient
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.7. . . , which originally meant 'be obedient'&emdash; 'bonny' . . .

Obey
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.2. . . while the woman vows to 'obey, serve, esteem, honour, . . .
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.2. . . while the woman vows to 'obey, serve, esteem, honour, . . .

Obligation
Chap.1 Sect.2 Para.1. . . that sexual relations are an obligation within marriage (vv . . .
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.2. . . Exodus 21.10f, on which this obligation is based. The . . .
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.3. . . , he did suggest that this obligation might distract a . . .

Obligations
Chap.2 Sect.6 Para.1. . . were the marriage vows or obligations. If either partner . . .
Chap.2 Sect.7 Para.3. . . was silent on these three obligations, but Paul was not. . . .
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.1. . . , Paul reminded them of their obligations within marriage./1 . . .
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.2. . . within marriage./1) Conjugal obligations (1Cor.7.3-5). We . . .
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.2. . . rights, but Paul spoke about obligations. He said that each . . .
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.3. . . prayer time./2) Material Obligations (1Cor.7.33-34). . . .
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.6. . . grounds are based on the obligations to provide . . .
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.6. . . , he did affirm them as obligations within marriage (1 . . .
Chap.4 Sect.2 Para.1. . . that marriage includes the obligations of emotional . . .

Obscure
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.4. . . more 'flowing', they can also obscure the meaning of the . . .

Obscured
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.5. . . it. This distinction is obscured in Mark, and it is . . .

Offences
Chap.5 Sect.2.1 Para.2. . . for adultery. New grounds or 'offences' such as cruelty, . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.1 Para.2. . . for adultery. New grounds or 'offences' such as cruelty, . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.1 Para.2. . . the concept of 'matrimonial offences'. This was . . .

Old
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.8. . . penalty for adultery, as the Old Testament law demanded. In . . .
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.2. . . ) Marriage is monogamous. The Old Testament allowed polygamy . . .
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.2. . . monogamy was the ideal in the Old Testament./2) Marriage is . . .
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.4. . . refused to repent. The Old Testament prophets said . . .
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.6. . . mention of the other Old Testament grounds for . . .
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.8. . . allowed divorce for other Old Testament grounds which . . .
Chap.2 Sect.5 Para.2. . . very popular./The traditional Old Testament grounds for . . .
Chap.2 Sect.6 Para.1. . . : The principle behind the Old Testament grounds for . . .
Chap.2 Sect.6 Para.2. . . divorce from Israel by the Old Testament prophets. They . . .
Chap.2 Sect.7 Para.1. . . did he think about the other Old Testament grounds for . . .
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.6. . . ./Did Paul allow the other Old Testament grounds for . . .
Chap.4 Sect.1 Para.1. . . in a marriage contract. The Old Testament example of God's . . .
Chap.4 Sect.1 Para.3. . . and divorce. He used the Old Testament to teach . . .
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.7. . . never a marriage vow in the Old Testament, though it did . . .
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.8. . . marriage vows include all the Old Testament vows which were . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.2 Para.1. . . Should the church teach the Old Testament grounds for . . .

Omit
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.7. . . side./The Gospels normally omit to mention things which . . .
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.7. . . would have been a scandal to omit it. Whether or not this . . .

Omitted
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.3. . . think that Mark and Luke omitted them when they . . .

One
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.2. . . , and the two shall become one flesh? [Gen.2.24] (6) So . . .
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.2. . . So they are no longer two but one flesh. What therefore God . . .
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.2. . . , "Why then did Moses command one to give a certificate of . . .
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.5. . . that a 'no-fault divorce' was one where the legal paper-work . . .
Chap.1 Sect.3 Para.1. . . forbade all divorce, with one exception. Later Church . . .
Chap.1 Sect.3 Para.1. . . out that Paul also had one exception, though a . . .
Chap.1 Sect.3 Para.1. . . exception, though a different one. Therefore, divorce was . . .
Chap.1 Sect.3 Para.1. . . could only truly end when one partner died, which was . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.4. . . 'do not ask for repayment'./One difficulty with removing . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.6. . . because the question would be one way to point out that his . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.1. . . their heads in public unless one realizes that this was an . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.5. . . as 'Any Matter', because this one ground included the second . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.5. . . that there was only one ground for divorce in this . . .
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.4. . . . Presumably Jesus meant that one should not immediately . . .
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.4. . . an erring partner, but one should invite repentance. . . .
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.6. . . 'go forth and multiply' was one of the 613 commands of the . . .
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.5. . . versions in Matthew: Every one who divorces his wife, . . .
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.8. . . between the two sides. When one reads the debate about . . .
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.8. . . the debate about divorce, one might conclude that the . . .
Chap.2 Sect.6 Para.2. . . Jewish marriage contracts. One example of a divorce which . . .
Chap.3 Sect.1 Para.2. . . ending the marriage, and if one partner wanted the divorce . . .
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.3. . . (1Cor.7.11). Some (or perhaps one) of the Corinthians had . . .
Chap.3 Sect.4 Para.2. . . , though it would have only one meaning for a 1st century . . .
Chap.3 Sect.5 Para.1. . . that a marriage ends when one of the partners dies (1Cor . . .
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.1. . . Husband of one wife?: The Pastorals say . . .
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.1. . . leader should be 'a man of one woman' (! Tim.3.2) and the . . .
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.1. . . phrase 'woman of one man' occurs in relation to . . .
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.1. . . translated 'a husband of one wife' and 'wife of one . . .
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.1. . . of one wife' and 'wife of one husband'. This has been . . .
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.6. . . men were permitted more than one spouse, so 'woman of one . . .
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.6. . . than one spouse, so 'woman of one man' would not make sense. . . .
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.7. . . women who were faithful to one man throughout their lives . . .
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.8. . . . They had to be 'a man of one woman' or 'a woman of one . . .
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.8. . . of one woman' or 'a woman of one man' - i.e. faithful to . . .
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.1. . . church teaching has only one ground for divorce - lack . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.1 Para.2. . . a divorce in Britain, though one could, theoretically, get . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.5 Para.2. . . is often impossible, because one person is rarely . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.5 Para.3. . . prospective partners, even if one of them is not divorced. . . .

One-man
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.7. . . to the Latin univira, 'a one-man woman'. The term is . . .

One-woman
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.7. . . honoured. The corresponding 'one-woman man' is not found . . .
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.7. . . honoured. The corresponding 'one-woman man' is not found in . . .

Opinion
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.4. . . they were asking Jesus his opinion of what the Law meant, . . .
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.1. . . : When Jesus was asked his opinion about the 'Any Matter' . . .
Chap.2 Sect.3 Para.2. . . independent interpreter whose opinion sometime agreed with . . .
Chap.2 Sect.7 Para.1. . . ) but before giving his opinion on this, he spoke . . .

Orations
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.7. . . in inscriptions and funeral orations concerning women who . . .

Order
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.4. . . in a very literal way, in order to highlight the . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2 Para.2. . . it in its cultural context in order to try and understand . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.3 Para.4. . . after an invalid divorce, in order to show how serious it . . .

Ordeyne
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.6. . . , if holy chyrche it wol ordeyne, and thereto I plight . . .

Ordination
Chap.1 Sect.3 Para.2. . . the sacraments of baptism and ordination are irreversible./ . . .

Original
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.7. . . even have been spoken in the original debate, because they . . .
Chap.2 Sect.3 Para.1. . . of Deut.24.1, the original readers of the older . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2 Para.2. . . what it meant to its original recipients. This . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.3 Para.1. . . again and remarry their original spouse?/Jesus' and . . .

Originally
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.3. . . added these phrases to an originally abbreviated account . . .
Chap.2 Sect.5 Para.5. . . or love'. This text referred originally to a slave wife . . .
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.1. . . and clothing'), which were originally the basis of the . . .
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.7. . . in bed and at board', which originally meant 'be obedient' . . .

Orthodox
Chap.1 Sect.3 Para.3. . . rights, and abandonment. The Orthodox Church decided to let . . .

Osmund
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.2. . . was drawn up in about 1085 by Osmund, Bishop of Salisbury. . . .

Outcome
Chap.5 Sect.2.3 Para.4. . . merely stating the logical outcome of remarriage after an . . .